I'm starting to enjoy this

A pretty extensive look at the plausibility that BushCo is lying about his service:
On Guard - or AWOL?

Ask any Republican who remembers the Clinton impeachment that they'll tell you, "It wasn't about oral sex (yeah, right) -- that's not the issue. The issue is that he lied about it." Likewise, it's not necessarily about Bush skipping out on duties in the ANG, but that he's lying about it. I'd like to see Bush sworn in under oath and asked about his service, that way there'd be no wiggle room along the lines of "well, he wasn't under oath when he lied and you have to lie under oath in order for it to be an impeachable offense".